Skip to content
Home » Recent Posts » Projects » Collins Street Tactical Bike Lanes

Collins Street Tactical Bike Lanes

UPDATED to final design

Much more than bike lanes — here’s a deep dive into the changes coming to three blocks of Collins Street in Hobart’s CBD in early 2025.

A photo of Collins Street near the intersection with Molle Street showing a few metres of green painted bike lane leading into a green painted bike box.
The best — almost only — bike infrastructure currently on Collins Street (image Google Maps).
  1. Whats the plan?
  2. Our thoughts
  3. Community concerns
  4. Alternative approaches
  5. Where’s it at?
  6. More info

What’s the plan?

City of Hobart has released the final design showing changes planned for the three blocks of Collins Street between Molle & Murray Streets.

The changes include:

  • Kerbside protected bike lanes — one in each direction for most of the length of the three blocks.
  • Speed limit change from 50 or 40 km/h to 30 km/h.
  • On street car parking changes — 49 spaces removed with 29 retained. All loading zones retained. Two disability car parks retained with additional disability parks to be installed nearby.
  • Two parklets for on street dining.
  • New pedestrian zebra crossings at the Victoria Street intersection. →
  • Consolidation of two bus stops into a so-called “superstop”. →
  • Opportunities for urban greening and bike & scooter parking.

Molle–Barrack–Harrington

For the two blocks between Molle and Harrington Street, the existing traffic lanes are wider than required. By narrowing these lanes it means that two protected bike lanes will be added while retaining one parking lane for the majority of the two blocks.

Harrington–Murray

The plan is a bit different between Harrington & Murray Streets. Less available space has meant that adding the two protected bike lanes requires removing two of the four car lanes. The planners have elected to remove the two parking lanes in order to retain two driving lanes.

A diagram showing planned changes to Collins Street between Harrington Street and Murray Street
City of Hobart’s final design for Collins Street between Harrington & Murray Streets. Colours added for clarity.

Kerb extensions have also complicated matters (as they often do) at the Victoria Street intersection. This combined with the provision of parklets for dining has meant that the bike lanes are not continuous between Harrington & Victoria Streets. As a result people on bikes and people driving will need to share a lane in this section.

Tactical?

This is a tactical project because the council will implement the changes using temporary measures like paint & bollards rather than more permanent adjustments such as altering kerbs. This means it’s quick to install and can be easily modified in response to ongoing assessment.

The plan is for a 24 month trial period. During that period there will be monitoring of a number of metrics — number of people on bikes & scooters, number of pedestrians crossing mid block (as a surrogate for perceived safety), parking occupancy, vehicle speeds, traffic impacts, confidence of people walking & riding, feedback from businesses & the broader community, and so on. The intention appears to be that more permanent infrastructure will be installed after that time.

Our thoughts

The good

Collins Street is a great street for active transport:
  • A vital connection between the shops, businesses & workplaces of the CBD and the homes in South Hobart and beyond. It’s also an important link for recreation, providing access to the rivulet, the bush and on to the mountain. It’s a crucial link to the new stadium too.
  • Already a popular route for people riding, scootering and walking. Many hundreds of people travel the Rivulet Track to get to & from the city each day. This route is the reason South Hobart has the highest rate of commuting by bike in Tassie and among the highest in the country — but at 7% it could be much higher. →
  • Relatively low volume & slow vehicle traffic. It’s not a good way to drive for many reasons: one way sections, one lane sections, traffic lights strongly favouring cross streets like Barrack Street, a better option one block over in traffic-flow-optimised Macquarie Street, and so on.
  • For all these reasons it’s long been identified by the council and state government as being a key street for active transport and bike lanes have been planned for years — see the timeline below.
An Australian Bureau of Statistics infographic showing the suburb in each state/territory with the highest proportion of bike commuters. South Hobart has the highest proportion in Tasmania with 7.3% riding their bike to work. Only the ACT and the NT have suburbs with higher proportions. The data comes from the ABS Census of Population and Housing 2021.
Data from the ABS Census 2021 shows South Hobart has the highest proportion of people riding their bike to work in Tasmania. At 7% it’s among the highest in the country.
Everyone will be safer:
  • People will walk along a calmer street with better crossings. Their risk of dying if hit by a car will drop from ~90% at the existing 50 km/h speed limit to ~10% at the new 30 km/h limit. There will be less scooters & bikes on the footpaths too. →
  • The bike lanes will be kerbside & protected — this is the safest type of on road bike infrastructure and meets all ages and abilities (AAA) standard. Those less confident riding bikes, older people, kids, people with various disabilities — many more will have the genuine option to ride a bike if they want.
  • There will be hook turn boxes to facilitate people on bikes turning right safely at intersections.
  • Together with 30 km/h speed limit signs, changes like narrower lanes and slight chicaning due to parking bays on alternating sides should encourage people to drive more slowly.
  • Calmer traffic means people in cars are safer too.
A line graph showing risk of death or serious injury relative to impact speed. The risk of death ramps up quickly from 10% at 30 km/h to 90% at 50 km/h. Risk of serious injury increases linearly from almost 0% at 10 km/h to almost 100% at 50 km/h.
Risk of death & serious injury in a pedestrian hit by a car. (Source Monash University Accident Research Centre)
Improvements in movement of cars:
  • No change to number of traffic lanes aside from removal of separate turning lanes at some intersections.
  • More people riding bikes into the city means fewer cars competing for space on Macquarie & Davey Streets.
  • Less dependence on a single mode of transport means a more resilient transport network — therefore less gridlock when a vehicle crash blocks a key road.
And more good things:
  • These changes should be just a first step to making Collins Street a better place for people to enjoy — future opportunities include better public transport facilities, street trees, planter boxes, seating and outdoor dining.
  • The tactical approach — enables a quick installation and allows future adjustments for an optimal outcome.
  • Many people in the community are strongly supportive — 1300 signed a supporting petition and 150 rode down Collins Street on a Sunday morning to show their support.

The less good

  • The bike lanes won’t connect to other parts of the network. The hope has to be they will continue to Argyle & Campbell Streets in the near future. The true benefits of safe bike infrastructure can’t be fully realised until there is a connected network. It’s clear that this is something that Hobart is struggling with — witness Davey Street, Argyle Street and many more.
  • The shared car & bike lane between Harrington & Victoria Streets won’t meet all ages and abilities standard — even if vehicle speeds become acceptably low the volume of traffic won’t. The result will be two points where bikes and cars will merge. Careful assessment of this section during the trial will be needed to see whether the compromise here is acceptable. →
A map showing a section of Collins Street with two points marked with yellow stars. One marked point is heading from the intersection with Harrington Street into the city. The second marked point is approaching Victoria Street from the city. At both points the bike lane & general traffic lane merge.
The yellow stars mark the two points where people on bikes and people driving will need to merge.
  • Success will mean limitations in the Hobart Rivulet Track become increasingly significant and council will need to address these issues — safer surfaces, more lighting, a better route through the car park, etc. A future upgrade converting the current shared path to separate paths for walking & cycling should be considered in the longer term too. The same applies to related infrastructure like the Bumpy Track.
  • Adjusting the timing of traffic signals to suit lower speeds isn’t mentioned in the concept but would be worthwhile investigating.

Community concerns

1. On street car parking

Among the many changes, it’s the potential impacts of reducing on street car parking spaces that is the most common concern raised.

Why remove parking?

Collins Street is essentially four lanes for vehicles — two moving, two parked — with a footpath either side. The footpaths aren’t particularly wide and support:

  • People walking, pushing prams, rolling in wheelchairs, scootering, waiting for buses with their luggage and sometimes riding their bikes.
  • Infrastructure like parking meters, bins, lamp posts, sign posts, seating, bike racks, outdoor dining furniture and A-frame shop signs.
A diagrammatic cross section of a street showing a footpath, a parking lane, two wide driving lanes, a second parking lane and a second footpath
A typical cross section of Collins Street as it is now. (Not to scale, made with StreetDesign.ai)

Realistically it’s only by reallocating some space from the four vehicle lanes that change can occur. The decision then comes down to whether the change is in vehicle parking or vehicle movement — in this case the decision was for parking changes.

So what will the impact be?

The council report states external analysis by consulting firm WSP indicates “the removal of parking bays will not have significant impacts on parking availability in the immediate vicinity of the project“. Their justification for this conclusion includes:

  • The demand for the on street parking in the three blocks averages 58% during weekdays. The Harrington-Murray block which is the busiest with the least parking is 79% (which is at the standard target occupancy of 80%).
  • Weekday peak occupancy for the 782 spaces in Centrepoint Car Park is 83% meaning there are 130 spaces available even at peak times. This is more than double the 59 on street spaces being removed.
  • There’s opportunities for more on street parking nearby that could be repurposed to short-stay parking if monitoring shows it’s required in future.
A chart illustrating how the 59 on street parking spaces planned for removal compares to 133 available and 649 occupied parking spaces in the Centrepoint Car Park at weekday peak occupancy.

Essentially they’ve concluded the on street parking as it stands isn’t fully utilised, and there’s also more than enough capacity in nearby parking to account for any shortcomings.

The bigger picture

In this particular case independent professional assessment shows the removal of parking won’t have significant impact. However it’s timely to mention the realities of on street parking in Hobart. Cities worldwide are rapidly moving away from prioritising on street parking because parking private cars is not an efficient use of this valuable public land. For example Paris is removing ~70,000 (or about 50%) of their on street parking spaces over a time span of a few years.

Hobart has traffic congestion and a growing population — parking your car directly outside the shop you’re visiting in the city at any time of day is no longer realistic. And while Hobart hasn’t reacted as rapidly as Paris, the planning here reached that conclusion a long time ago. For example the Gehl Report recommended in 2010 that Hobart should aim to reduce on street parking.

Today on street parking dominates the city centre of Hobart. The parked cars create barriers and leave only little space for other activities. Introduce a parking strategy aiming to reduce the amount of on street parking. Transfer parking from streets to parking structures. Ensure high quality parking structures at the edge of the city centre rather than within. Remove private cars from the harbour front.
Recommendation on parking in Hobart from the Gehl Report in 2010.

2. Business impacts

Some business owners on Collins Street are concerned that less on street car parking will lead to less customers and less revenue. While it’s understandable to be concerned about change, the proven reality is that making streets better for cycling and walking improves business.

Research in New York showed that shops next to a protected bike lane saw a 49% increase in sales compared to 3% for Manhattan as a whole. Similarly in the UK studies have shown that high street changes aimed at improving cycling and walking increase retail sales by up to 30%. →

High street walking, cycling and public realm improvements can increase retail sales by up to 30% (source Lawlor 2013). Cycle parking delivers 5 times the retail spend per square metre than the same area of car parking (source Rate and Saffrey 2016). People who walk and cycle take more trips to the high street over the course of a month — average number of visits to local town centre each month: walking 16 visits, cycling 12 visits, driving 8 visits (source TfL 2014). Over a month, people who walk to the high street spend up to 40% more than people who drive to the high street (source TfL 2013).
Effects of street improvements encouraging more walking & cycling on consumer spending. (Source Transport for London)

Research shows many other benefits for businesses too. Some examples:

  • Retail vacancy was 17% lower after high street and town centre improvements.
  • Physically active employees took 27% less sick days.
  • 73% of employees who cycle felt it made them more productive at work.

3. Accessibility

An older man rides a bike down a street

People with disabilities which limit their mobility have the right to be able to access businesses and services they need. Some in the community are concerned the planned changes might impact this. However council states they intend to retain 91% of priority kerbside access — this includes accessibility parking bays as well as loading areas. They also state they are engaging with the City Access Advisory Committee to inform the location of additional accessible parking bays in the final design, suggesting accessible parking may in fact increase.

It’s also important to remember many people in the community can’t or don’t drive — people with various disabilities, older people, children & adolescents, people unable to afford to buy & run a car, and so on. Safer walking, riding, scootering & wheeling will improve mobility and therefore accessibility for these people.

4. Council income

Another concern raised has been a potential reduction in City of Hobart income from on street parking payments. In general there’s more important factors at play in decisions about parking than revenue generation. Putting this aside though, there’s a number of reasons the impact shouldn’t be significant:

  1. The 49 parking spaces being converted to other uses equates to just 1.1% of total paid spaces operated by the council (~2000 on street, >2500 off street).
  2. It’s likely many people will change their behaviour and park elsewhere. This will help mitigate any income loss.

5. Other concerns

We’ve posted a thread on X addressing a couple of other specific concerns.

Alternative approaches

Let’s consider a couple of variations on the plan.

Alternative 1 — a single direction bike lane on Collins Street

Proposed by some in the community. The idea is a single bike lane along Collins Street with the bike lane in the reverse direction on a nearby street — realistically either Macquarie or Liverpool Streets. The stated benefit is that less on street parking would need to be removed from Collins Street.

Thoughts on this approach:

  • Parking changes would be spread across two streets, however the net effect across the CBD would be similar.
  • A bike lane on Macquarie Street is unlikely. Planning documents don’t indicate intentions for a bike lane. Recent changes by the state government have removed parking specifically to increase traffic lanes. In reality the space would be better utilised as a dedicated transit lane for a rapid bus network or light rail.
  • Which leaves Liverpool Street. It’s essentially the reverse of Collins — parking changes would be similar. However it would be difficult to connect to the Rivulet Track, requiring either a contra-flow (against traffic) bike lane on Molle Street or a bike lane on Barrack Street (a street where high throughput of vehicle traffic is prioritised). Collins Street is flatter too.
  • Finally, the one-way system for vehicles in Hobart’s CBD is notoriously tedious to navigate. Replicating it in the bike network would be a failure to learn from past mistakes. →
A map showing two return routes after coffee or lunch near Victoria Street. One return route is via a Collins Street bike lane and is two blocks long. A second return route is via a Liverpool Street bike lane, is much more circuitous and is ten blocks long.
A common journey that sums up the issues with one way routes. Returning to the Rivulet Track from coffee or lunch near Victoria Street. A trip of 2 blocks on a Collins Street bike lane (blue arrow) becomes 10 blocks(!) on a Liverpool Street bike lane (orange arrows).
Alternative 2 — clearways

Another suggestion is that the bike lanes could be made available only during peak commuting times with the lanes converting to on-street parking outside of these times.

Clearways are often used to add capacity for vehicle movements during peak times. They can work well providing there’s a high degree of compliance with not parking at peak times. However it only takes one car left parked too long to stop the whole lane from functioning (this often happens on Sandy Bay Road for example).

As well, using this approach for bikes lanes on Collins Street is different because it’s not flexing additional capacity — from 2 lanes to 3 for example — it’s adding and removing the entire capacity. That means that unless you’re strict about riding your bike to and from the city within the peak hours, you don’t get the safety & confidence benefits the protected bike lanes provide. This would clearly have a significant impact on motivating people who are less confident on their bikes and to a large extent defeats the whole purpose of adding bike lanes in the first place.

Another issue with this approach is a practical one. In order to meet the all ages and abilities standard — which is both appropriate and the plan — the bike lanes need to be protected from vehicles with bollards or similar. It’s difficult to imagine how this could be achieved while then also making the space accessible for vehicles to park in outside of peak commuting times.

Alternative 3 — retaining an on street parking lane

The concept plan removes two parking lanes between Harrington & Murray Streets in order to retain two driving lanes. An alternative approach would be to remove one parking lane and one driving lane.

This approach would retain more on street parking. The trade off would be the block becomes one-way. While this is usually not desirable, the next block of Collins Street — Murray to Elizabeth — is already one-way and so the effects are limited. Effectively some Murray Street traffic would need to turn right earlier to use Liverpool or Bathurst Streets. →

This is a legitimate alternative and may well be preferred by the community given the extra on street parking. The changes required might be more than is suitable for a tactical approach but are minimal — essentially a no right turn from Murray Street into Collins Street.

A map of Hobart's CBD. There's a blue arrow on Collins Street from Harrington to Elizabeth. There's red arrows on Murray Street from Liverpool to Collins and on Collins Street from Murray to Harrington. There's green arrows along Liverpool and Bathurst Streets to Barrack.
Red arrows show a route no longer possible if Collins Street were to be made one-way between Harrington & Murray Streets. Green arrows show alternate routes. The change in journey length is destination dependent — for many destinations there’s no change while the worst case adds two block lengths. Of note the Bathurst~Barrack combination is a prioritised route in the TNOP and will typically be faster.

Where’s it at?

City of Hobart is aiming for installation in early 2025.

Project timeline
  • 14 October 2024 — City of Hobart councillors voted to reallocate funds from the 2024-25 budget contingency to enable the project to be completed without the state government grant
  • 11 October 2024 — the Tasmanian Minister for Transport announced he had directed the Department of State Growth not to proceed with the $170,000 grant
  • 17 September 2024 — planning documents for the proposed Macquarie Point stadium submitted to the Tasmanian Planning Commission reveal an active transport corridor along Collins Street as a key part of the transport plan for the stadium
  • 16 September 2024 — City of Hobart councillors voted to endorse the final design
  • 15 July 2024 — the Tasmanian Minister for Transport announced a $170,000 grant for construction of the Collins Street tactical cycleway in round 2 of the Better Active Transport Grant program
  • May 2024 — City of Hobart councillors voted to proceed to a more detailed design phase involving further community engagement
  • 2023 — Central Hobart Plan & Inner Hobart Traffic Network Operations Plan both endorsed with Collins Street part of the cycling network
  • 2023 — $30,000 for Collins Street cycleway design — granted to City of Hobart by the Tasmanian government as part of the Better Active Transport in Greater Hobart program
  • 2022 — traffic signals installed at the intersection of Collins & Molle Streets
  • 2021 — Greater Hobart Cycling Plan endorsed by the state government and four greater Hobart councils which includes extending the all ages and ability bike network along Collins Street
  • 2019 — $100,000 for an outbound marked bike lane on Collins Street from Victoria Street to Molle Street — granted to City of Hobart by the Australian government
  • 2019 — City of Hobart Annual Plan 2019-20: “Finalise the concept design for improved bicycle connections along Collins Street
  • 2018— City of Hobart Annual Plan 2018-19: “Prepare concept design for improved bicycle connections along Collins Street
  • 2017 — City of Hobart Annual Plan 2017-18: “Prepare concept design for improved bicycle connections along Collins Street
  • 2010 — Gehl Report and City of Hobart’s response the Inner City Action Plan recommend strengthening the connection from the Rivulet track along Collins Street to the city including a bike lane
  • 2009 — Hobart Regional Arterial Bicycle Network Plan includes an arterial cycleway on Collins Street
  • 1996 — City of Hobart’s Bicycle Study included Collins Street as a key route in a very sparse network:
Map branded with an old Hobart City Council logo and labeled "Bicycle Study 1996". It shows a network of bike routes including a route from Cascades along the Hobart Rivulet then along Collins Street to Macquarie Point.
City of Hobart Bicycle Study 1996 showing plans for a bike route along Collins Street.

More info

City of Hobart project page
Final design
Greater Hobart Cycling Plan

2 thoughts on “Collins Street Tactical Bike Lanes”

  1. I support the Collins St bike lanes. I really hope this gets through–It’s scary trying to share the road with cars who don’t want to share with bikes.

  2. I wonder if it’s a distraction from a more significant issue. The government hasn’t done anything to improve public transport, so it’s like they’re trying to blame bike lanes for not fixing our car dependency. As people are liberated with their cars in Tasmania, without them, they are trapped, except those who live close enough to the inner urban cores and have/will have the option to use active transport and save money.
    Bike lanes raise many emotions; sometimes, people already have strong opinions about cyclists. When people are emotional, misinformation is challenging to remedy. This can lead to misunderstandings, make it easy for the government to dodge responsibility for making fundamental changes in transport, and stoke culture wars. So, by stirring up arguments about bike lanes, the government might be hiding the fact that we still don’t have good alternatives to driving everywhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *